MA (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Facts

A panel of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had properly considered the evidence before it and had taken full account of public interest considerations in determining that the deportation of a long-settled Pakistani national would be contrary to his rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 so that a later decision of a senior immigration judge that the matter fell to be reconsidered by another panel was erroneous.